Sexist Language Representation in the Works of Saadi and Ferdowsi: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Author

PhD in Linguistics, National Language Institute researcher, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Persian classical literature, as a reflection of the cultural and ideological structures of its time, has played a significant role in shaping and consolidating dominant discourses, including gendered discourse. This study, grounded in the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), investigates the representation of sexist language in the works of Saadi and Ferdowsi, aiming to identify the linguistic mechanisms and discourse-oriented components that contribute to the production and reproduction of the symbolic patriarchal order within these texts. The data for this research consists of purposefully selected verses that exemplify prominent instances of sexist language in the works of both poets. Employing a descriptive-analytical methodology, the data has been collected through library-based research. The analysis reveals that, despite the poets’ different historical and cultural contexts, both exhibit traces of sexist language that manifest in the linguistic and semantic layers of their poetry. These patterns reflect the pervasive influence of patriarchal dominance and androcentrism, contributing to the perpetuation of gender-biased discourse. Therefore, the findings suggest that Persian classical literature—despite stylistic and temporal differences—has largely functioned in the service of maintaining a symbolic order centered around male dominance.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Baker, P. & Ellece, S. (2011).Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Cook-Gumperz J. (1995). Reproducing the discourse of mothering: How gendered talk makes gendered lives. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 401-419). Routledge.
Dabbagh, A., & Babaii, E. (2024). Representation of women in English and Persian proverbs: A Cultural-Linguistic perspective. Pragmatics and Society, 15(6), 929–951. 
Fairclough, N. (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Political correctness: the politics of culture and language. Discourse Soc. 14, 17–28. 
Gochman, D. S. (2013). Handbook of health behavior research II: Provider determinants. Springer Science & Business Media.
He. A, & Zhang. Y. (2018). Sexism in English Proverbs and Idioms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 424-429.
Karami, R. (2020). Gender bias in Persian literature textbooks. Journal of International Women's Studies, 21(1), 374–386. 
Lakoff, R (1973).Language in Society, Vol.2 No.1, pp. 45-79.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Lazar, M. M. (2019). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lazar, M. M. (Ed.). (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lazar, M. M. (Ed.). (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McGill, L. (2022). The Metaphysical Muse: Gender and Desire in Seventeenth-Century English Poetry. Cambridge University Press.
Miller, A. (2019). Gender and Discourse in Medieval English Poetry. Routledge.
Mills, S. (2023). Gender and Ideology in Literary Language. Routledge.
Reisigl,M, (2017).The Discourse-Historical Approach,In Flower dew, J, & Richardson, J. E. (2018). The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Routledge.
Stahlberg, D. Braun, F. Irmen, L. and Sczesny, S. (2007). “Representation of the sexes in language,« in Social Communication. A Volume in the Series Frontiers of Social Psychology, ed. K. Fiedler (New York, NY: Psychology Press), 163–187.
Stibbe, A. (2015).Language, Ecology, and the Stories We Live by.New York: Routledge.
Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered discourses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Talbot, M. (2010). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
The Linguistic Representation of Woman in Proverbial Discourses: Comparison between Persian and English. (2021). Academia.edu.
Toolan, M. (2022). Narrative Progression and Gender Representation. Oxford University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis,The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Editied by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton,Vol 1:Oxford:John Wiley & Sons,Inc.
Imani, A. (2022). The linguistic representation of woman in proverbial discourses: Comparison between Persian and English. Journal of Language Teaching, Literature & Linguistics, 5(1), 1–15.